Care about the environment? Eat less meat
Care about the environment? Eat less meat
PETER FRICKER
$
Special to Globe and Mail Update
January 23, 2008 at 12:00 AM EST
Last week, Rajendra Pachauri, the head of the United Nation's Nobel
Prize-winning scientific panel on climate change, asked the world
to"please eat less meat.”Speaking at a press conference in Paris,
he said meat was a very carbon-intensive commodity, a fact
established by UN research showing that livestock production creates
more greenhouse gases than all forms of transport combined.
So the top man at the world's most important agency dealing with
climate change (the planet's biggest problem) is urging us all to cut
meat consumption to address the issue. Is the Prime Minister ordering
Environment Canada to draft guidelines for Canadian consumers? Is
Parliament debating the matter? Are environmental groups demanding
immediate action?
Unfortunately, Mr. Pachauri's plea will cause barely a ripple in
political, media or environmental circles. Even being chair of the
International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) doesn't guarantee many
people will want to hear this particular inconvenient truth. it's
interesting to note that he followed his statement by saying: "This
is something that the IPCC was afraid to say earlier, but now we have
said it.”
What was the IPCC afraid of? This hasn't been reported, but one could
speculate that the global livestock industry and others with a vested
interest in meat production will not take kindly to Mr. Pachauri's
remarks. Neither will the politicians they lobby, who also hate
having to tell citizens they need to make lifestyle changes to save
the planet.
Even environmental groups are shy about touching this one. Some don't
even mention limiting meat consumption as a means of combatting
global warming. Others relegate it to a list of minor energy-saving
actions consumers can take, just below keeping your car's tires
properly inflated. The suspicion (especially among animal-welfare
groups) is that environmentalists are afraid they'll be open to
charges of hypocrisy if they raise the meat issue and get caught
wolfing down a Wendy's burger after the press conference.
Then there are the dreaded V-words: vegetarian and vegan. Few
politicians or environmentalists want to face the jokes, media
backlash and libertarian"consumer freedom"zealots who will accuse
them of forcing Canadians to eat only salad and lentils. The same
sort of people who fought against mandatory seatbelts and
restrictions on tobacco would shift their public relations and spin
machines into high gear.
Yet all the IPCC is asking for is a reduction in meat consumption. A
recent study in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet called for
a 10-per-cent cut in meat consumption, which it said would slow
global warming considerably. It would also slow the growth of factory
farming, which is alarming animal welfarists around the world. Global
demand for meat is projected to double between 2001 and 2050, meaning
billions more animals will be raised in intensive, inhumane
conditions. While many animal activists are"Abolitionists"And want
a meat-free world, others would welcome anything that would put the
brakes on a trend that is resulting in animal suffering on a mind-
boggling scale. For example, the international farm-animal welfare
organization Compassion in World Farming is calling for meat
consumption and production in developed countries to be cut by a
third by 2020. This would mean someone who eats meat every day would
cut back to eating meat five days a week — not exactly a hardship.
Encouraging the public to cut back on meat would also have major
health benefits. The World Cancer Research Fund recently urged
consumers to limit consumption of red meat to 500 grams per week and
to avoid processed meats completely. (Vegetarians and vegans figured
out the health advantages of a meatless diet long ago. That's why
they have lower rates of obesity, heart disease, diabetes, colon
cancer, hypertension and other diseases.)
Cutting down or cutting out meat is a win-win-win policy. Not only
does it help the fight against global warming, but it saves countless
animals from factory-farm suffering and it's good for you.
it's just too bad so many people are afraid to talk about it.
Peter Fricker is the projects and communications director of the
Vancouver Humane Society.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080122.wcomment01
23/BNStory/International/home
Related Articles
Choking on Growth: China's Environmental Crisis
Care about the environment? Eat less meat
To the end of the Earth - Six Degrees
Disclaimer: Our material may be copied, printed and distributed by referring to this site. This site also contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the education and research provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance freedom of inquiry for a better understanding of religious, spiritual and inter-faith issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.