Christ could be born a thousand times in Galilee—but all in vain ...
"Many years ago in one of my classes, while disputing an interpretation of one of the parables in the Gospels, an ordained minister of a Protestant church declared," Mysticism has nothing to do with Christianity; it is just a Catholic heresy.”To be sure, he later regretted having made that remark and wished to withdraw it because, as he said, he had spoken unconsciously. After the class, a Sufi Muslim and now a well-known professor of religion, said to me with tears in his eyes," How sad! So many Christians don't know what treasures there are in the Gospels.” This book is written in the hope of letting the inner Christ grow in us; for me it is a form of prayer and meditation. I am called by, and heartily endorse, what the seventeenth-century mystic Angelus Silesius (translated by Frederick Franck) wrote: Christ could be born a thousand times in Galilee ...”- Ravi Ravindra Ph.D.
“This book is written with certain assumptions and attitudes, which
together specify what may be called"The method of vertical
reasoning.”
The first assumption is that the Gospel According to St. John is not
on test. If anyone or anything is on test, , it is we ourselves and
our sensitivity. The text has proved itself: many times, in many
places, and to many very intelligent and sensitive people. It is one
of the most sacred texts of a great religion, and it has provided
spiritual nourishment to an entire culture over centuries. If it does
not speak to us, alas! too bad for us! It is not for nothing that so
many great teachers have said words to this effect: "You have ears
but you do not hear; you have eyes but you do not see.”If we cannot
hear, we must surely be hardened and closed of heart, and in a
defensive posture of narrow-mindedness. There are some people in whom
such a posture has been formed in reaction to the extreme
insensitivity and bellicose aggression of others who proclaim
adherence or opposition to the Gospel and its message. Still, if we
can free ourselves of such reactions, the beauty of the Gospel will
be apparent.
The second assumption is that the Gospel has come down to us from a
higher mind than ours. If there is something in it that we do not
understand, the difficulty is likely to be in us and in our
limitations. One cannot be blind to the fact that there are several
places where later editors, compliers, translators, and others with
various interests have added words or stories to the Gospel that
change the original meaning or intention. This was perhaps done
sometimes unintentionally and sometimes with a view to a doctrinal
dispute. Wherever scholarship has revealed several alterations or
additions in the text, a note has been made if appropriate and
helpful in understanding the heart of the matter. Otherwise, in
attempting to make sense of the text, whenever there is any question
about its intelligence, there is no doubt that the Gospel comes from
a higher intelligence that ours. In fact, precisely at the point
where our best efforts do not yield a satisfactory sense in the
Gospel, there is an opportunity for us to listen quietly with
humility so that we may hear what we are not accustomed to hear and
may allow the Gospel to work its magic in uplifting us above
ourselves.
I am convinced that scriptures and teachers are not among us for them
to be intelligible to us while we remain as we are; on the contrary,
I believe that they are here so that we may rise above where we
ordinarily are. All religions everywhere insist that we do not live
as we might: from our right mind. Thus we live in sin, or in sorrow,
or in illusion, or in a dreamlike sleepy state; and not in grace,
with joy, in reality, wakeful. The teachings from above, of which the
scriptures are an example, cannot be for the purpose of adding more
knowledge or comfort or dreams to our sleepy state; they can nudge us
a little toward wakefulness if we do not undo their effect by
dragging them down to our level—where we win or lose theological
arguments, convert others to our doctrines, and exercise control over
them while remaining as we are, untransformed.
The third assumption is that the Gospel belongs to the whole world,
and in particular to those who feel called by it and find some help
in it, even if they are not nominally Christian and have no need of
so labelling themselves. It is a great classic of world spirituality,
and it is too important to be relegated to an exclusively sectarian
reading. I detect a curious attitude among many of the Christians I
have met, scholars and non-scholars alike. They find it a little odd
that anybody who is not a Christian should be seriously reading
Christian books. It is understandable to them that one might read
such books to become a Christian, or even in order to engage in
polemics against Christianity, but it is expected that one must
choose and take sides. Commitment to Christ seems to imply for them
either an enthusiastic to mild commitment against other teachers and
teachings or a certain degree of tolerance and allowance for the
coexistence of other religions, but it does not very often allow any
conviction that these other teachings could be useful for one's own
salvation. And those Christians who find something of value in other
teachings often find it necessary to put Christianity down and to
deny that they are Christians. Perhaps this either/or attitude arises
from an overliteral interpretation of a fragment of a saying of Jesus
Christ," He who is not with me is against me" (Matthew 12:30; Luke
11:23). For myself, I am happy to find light wherever I can, without
thereby having to deny other sources of illumination or other colors
of the spectrum, which together can more fully express the glory and
abundance of the Vastness than any one can alone.
The fourth assumption is that there is a characteristic, which I call
spiritual sensitivity, that perhaps all human beings have a
rudimentary form and that is highly developed in some. This spiritual
sense is able to comprehend subtle ideas, suggestions, and phenomena
that are not comprehensible to the other senses or to the rational
mind. To me it appears obvious that scholarship, erudition, and
mental acumen by themselves are not sufficient for approaching the
scriptures, although they justly have a high place and could be most
illuminating. This extra dimension of spiritual sensitivity seems to
be a much more important requirement. As is said in another
tradition, just as a donkey bearing a load of sandalwood knows its
weight but not its fragrance, so also the scholar may know the texts
of the scriptures but not their significance. It is clear, however,
that ignorance of what scholarship has to say about any matter
pertaining to the scriptures is by itself no guarantee of spiritual
sensitivity!
My interest in the Gospel is not doctrinal or dogmatic in the
ordinary sense of these words. Nevertheless, we may recognize and
understand what Jesus the Christ said: "Whoever chooses to do the
will of God will know about the doctrine—namely, whether it comes
from God or is merely my own" (John 7:17).
There are many levels of the quality of being Christian—from Jesus
the Christ to Torquemada the inquisitor. In pointing to this
variation, my purpose is not to belittle Christianity or to elevate
it; a similar qualitative range exists in every religious tradition.
My interest in this book is to discover a subtler and less churchly
level in the Gospel than is usual, which is lost to many thoughtful
and sensitive Christians as well as non-Christians simply because
they have not been taught to appreciate the various levels of being
within each person or of the corresponding levels in Christianity. As
we grow spiritually, it is natural and necessary to move past the
level of religion that we know and in which we dwell; in clinging to
that level, we accept a stunting of the natural process of
development. Unfortunately, far too often there is a fixed,
externalized notion of what Christianity is that does not permit
people, especially disgruntled ex-Christians, to see its immense
spiritual wealth or its dynamic elasticity, which is adequate to the
full measure of the most developed soul. Many years ago in one of my
classes, while disputing an interpretation of one of the parables in
the Gospels, an ordained minister of a Protestant church
declared," Mysticism has nothing to do with Christianity; it is just
a Catholic heresy.”To be sure, he later regretted having made that
remark and wished to withdraw it because, as he said, he had spoken
unconsciously. After the class, a Sufi Muslim and now a well-known
professor of religion, said to me with tears in his eyes," How sad!
So many Christians don't know what treasures there are in the
Gospels.”
This book is written in the hope of letting the inner Christ grow in
us; for me it is a form of prayer and meditation. I am called by, and
heartily endorse, what the seventeenth-century mystic Angelus
Silesius (translated by Frederick Franck) wrote:
Christ could be born
a thousand times in Galilee—but all in vain
until He is born in me.”
The Gospel of John in the Light of Indian Mysticism, pp. 4-7
Ravi Ravindra Ph.D.
Inner Traditions; Revised edition (August 16, 2004)
Disclaimer: Our material may be copied, printed and distributed by referring to this site. This site also contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the education and research provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance freedom of inquiry for a better understanding of religious, spiritual and inter-faith issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.