
Religious Experience
“Mysticism,
a quest for a hidden truth or wisdom ("the
treasure hidden in the centres of our souls"), in
the 20th century is undergoing a renewal of interest
and understanding and even a mood of expectancy
similar to that which had marked its role in previous
eras. Such a mood stems in part from the feeling of
alienation that many persons experience in the modern
world. Put down as a religion of the elite, mysticism
(or the mystical faculty of perceiving transcendental
reality) is said by many to belong to all men, though
few use it. The British author Aldous Huxley has
stated that "a totally unmystical world would be
a world totally blind and insane," and the Indian
poet Rabindranath Tagore has noted that "Man has
a feeling that he is truly represented in something
which exceeds himself."
The goal of mysticism is union with the divine or sacred.
The path to that union is usually developed by following
four stages: purgation (of bodily desires), purification (of
the will), illumination (of the mind), and unification (of
one's will or being with the divine). If "the object of
man's existence is to be a Man, that is, to re-establish the
harmony which originally belonged between him and the
divinized state before the separation took place which
disturbed the equilibrium" (The Life and Doctrine of
Paracelsus), mysticism will always be a part of the way of
return to the source of being, a way of counteracting the
experience of alienation. Mysticism has always held--and
parapsychology also seems to suggest--that the discovery of
a nonphysical element in man's personality is of utmost
significance in his quest for equilibrium in a world of
apparent chaos. (see also purification rite)
Mysticism's apparent denial, or self-negating, is part of a
psychological process or strategy that does not really deny
the person. In spite of its lunatic fringe, the maturer
forms of mysticism satisfy the claims of rationality,
ecstasy, and righteousness.
There is obviously something nonmental, alogical,
paradoxical, and unpredictable about the mystical
phenomenon, but it is not, therefore, irrational or
antirational or "religion without thought." Rather, as Zen
(Buddhist intuitive sect) masters say, it is knowledge of
the most adequate kind, only it cannot be expressed in
words. If there is a mystery about mystical experience, it
is something it shares with life and consciousness.
Mysticism, a form of living in depth, indicates that man, a
meeting ground of various levels of reality, is more than
one-dimensional. Despite the interaction and correspondence
between levels--"What is below is like what is above; what
is above is like what is below" (Tabula Smaragdina, "Emerald
Tablet," a work on alchemy attributed to Hermes Trismegistus)--they
are not to be equated or confused. At once a praxis
(technique) and a gnosis (esoteric knowledge), mysticism
consists of a way or discipline.
The relationship of the religion of faith to mysticism
("personal religion raised to the highest power") is
ambiguous, a mixture of respect and misgivings. Though
mysticism may be associated with religion, it need not be.
The mystic often represents a type that the religious
institution (e.g., church) does not and cannot produce and
does not know what to do with if and when one appears. As
William Ralph Inge, an English theologian, commented,
"institutionalism and mysticism have been uneasy
bedfellows." Although mysticism has been the core of
Hinduism and Buddhism, it has been little more than a minor
strand--and, frequently, a disturbing element -- in Judaism,
Christianity, and Islam. As the 15th- to 16th-century
Italian political philosopher Niccolò Machiavelli had noted
of the 13th-century Christian monastic leaders St. Francis
and St. Dominic, they had saved religion but destroyed the
church.
The founders of religion may have been incipient or advanced
mystics, but the inner compulsions of their experience have
proved less amenable to dogmas, creeds, and institutional
restrictions, which are bound to be outward and majority
oriented. There are religions of authority and the religion
of the spirit. Thus, there is a paradox: if the mystic
minority is distrusted or maltreated, religious life loses
its sap; on the other hand, these "peculiar people" do not
easily fit into society, with the requirements of a
prescriptive community composed of less sensitive seekers of
safety and religious routine. Though no deeply religious
person can be without a touch of mysticism, and no mystic
can be, in the deepest sense, other than religious, the
dialogue between mystics and conventional religionists has
been far from happy. From both sides there is a constant
need for restatement and revaluation, a greater tolerance, a
union of free men's worship. Though it validates religion,
mysticism also tends to escape the fetters of organized
religion.”
Religious Experience
http://cyberspacei.com/jesusi/inlight/religion/experience/experience.htm