Is Shakti Force?

From: "jagbir singh" <>
Date: Fri Jan 27, 2006 9:41 am
Subject: Is Shakti Force?

> —- In, "jagbir singh"
<adishakti_org@y...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Dear Semira,
> >
> > Definitely and without question the Divine Message will triumph
> > over the organization itself. In future more and more people
> > will embrace its central message of evolving into the eternal
> > spirit that all religions, holy scriptures and prophets have
> > since time immemorial upheld. The Divine Message is a spiritual
> > sanctuary, a beacon of hope, joy, peace of eternal life to all
> > humans. The Shakti/Holy Spirit/Ruh/Aykaa Mayee is the Divine
> > Feminine that gives Self-realization/Birth of Spirit/Baptism of
> > Allah/Opens Dasam Dwar for humanity to enter the Sahasrara/
> > Kingdom of God/Niche of lights/Inner Sanctuary within where
> > Brahman/God Almighty/Allah/ Waheguru resides as THE LIGHT.
> > Semira, not only the current Sahaja Yoga organisation but all
> > religious organizations as well have merely been intended as
> > temporary vehicles and starting points for the Divine Message.
> >
> > jagbir
> >
> >
> > —- In, "jagbir singh"
<adishakti_org@y...> wrote:
> By the way things are moving the Adi Shakti will eventually
> triumph. All we need to do as Her bhaktas is to stand our ground
> and not yield an inch because Truth always triumphs. Years of
> silence from religious regimes is the sure sign that the Devi and
> Her Divine Message to all humanity cannot be challenged, and will
> eventually be victorious in Her battle against the evil forces.
> All we need to do is to fearlessly announce the Truth. Shanti,
> Shanti, Shanti.

Is Shakti Force?

There are some persons who have thought, and still think, that
Shakti means force and that the worship of Shakti is the worship of
force. Thus Keshub Chunder Sen (New Dispensation, p. 108), wrote:

Four centuries ago the Shaktas gave way before the Bhaktas.
Chaitanya's army proved invincible, and carried all Bengal captive.
Even to-day his gospel of love rules as a living force, though his
followers have considerably declined both in faith and in morals.
Just the reverse of this we find in England and other European
countries. There the Shaktas are driving the Bhaktas out of the
field. Look at the Huxleys, the Tyndalls and the Spencers of the
day. What are they but Shaktas, worshipers of Shakti or Force? The
only Deity they adore, if they at all adore one, is the Prime Force
of the universe. To it they offer dry homage. Surely then the
scientists and materialists of the day are a sect of Shakti-
worshipers, who are chasing away the true Christian devotees who
adore the God of Love. Alas! for European Vaishnavas; they are
retreating before the advancing millions of Western Shaktas. We
sincerely trust, however, the discomfiture of devotion and Bhakti
will be only for a time, and that a Chaitanya will yet arise in the
West, crush the Shaktas, who only recognize Force as Deity and are
sunk in carnality and voluptuousness, and lead natures into the
loving faith, spirituality, simplicity, and rapturous devotion of
the Vaishnava.

Professor Monier Williams ("Hinduism") also called it a doctrine of

Recently the poet Rabindranath Tagore has given the authority of his
great name to this error (Modern Review, July, 1919). After pointing
out that Egoism is the price paid for the fact of existence and that
the whole universe is assisting in the desire that the "I" should
be, he says that man has viewed this desire in two different ways,
either as a whim of Creative Power, or a joyous self-expression of
Creative Love. Is the fact then of his being, he asks, a revealment
of Force or of Love? Those who hold to the first view must also, he
thinks, recognize conflict as inevitable and eternal. For according
to them Peace and Love are but a precarious coat of armor within
which the weak seek shelter, whereas that which the timid
anathematize as unrighteousness, that alone is the road to
success. "The pride of prosperity throws man's mind outwards and the
misery and insult of destitution draws man's hungering desires
likewise outwards. These two conditions alike leave man unashamed to
place above all other gods, Shakti the Deity of Power—the Cruel
One, whose right hand wields the weapon of guile. In the politics of
Europe drunk with Power we see the worship of Shakti."

In the same way the poet says that in the days of their political
disruption, the cowed and down-trodden Indian people through the
mouths of their poets sang the praises of the same Shakti. "The
Chandi of Kavikangkan and of the Annadamangala, the Ballad of
Manasa, the Goddess of Snakes, what are they but Paeans of the
triumph of Evil? The burden of their song is the defeat of Shiva the
good at the hands of the cruel deceitful criminal Shakti." "The male
Deity who was in possession was fairly harmless. But all of a sudden
a feminine Deity turns up and demands to be worshipped in his stead.
That is to say that she insisted on thrusting herself where she had
no right. Under what title? Force! By what method? Any that would

The Deity of Peace and Renunciation did not survive. Thus he adds
that in Europe the modern Cult of Shakti says that the pale anaemic
Jesus will not do. But with high pomp and activity Europe celebrates
her Shakti worship.

"Lastly the Indians of to-day have set to the worship Europe's
Divinity. In the name of religion some are saying that it is
cowardly to be afraid of wrong-doing. Both those who have attained
worldly success, and those who have failed to attain it are singing
the same tune. Both fret at righteousness as an obstacle which both
would overcome by physical force." I am not concerned here with any
popular errors that there may be. After all, when we deal with a
Shastrik term it is to the Shastra itself that we must look for its
meaning. Shakti comes from the root Shak "to be able," "to do". It
indicates both activity and capacity therefor. The world, as word,
is activity. But when we have said that, we have already indicated
that it is erroneous to confine the meaning of the term Shakti to
any special form of activity. On the contrary Shakti means both
power in general and every particular form of power. Mind is a
Power: so is Matter. Mind is constantly functioning in the form of
Vritti; Reasoning, Will and Feeling (Bhava) such as love, aversion
and so forth are all aspects of Mind-power in its general sense.
Force is power translated to the material plane, and is therefore
only one and the grossest aspect of Shakti or power. But all these
special powers are limited forms of the great creative Power which
is The Mother (Ambika) of the Universe. Worship of Shakti is not
worship of these limited forms but of the Divine will, knowledge and
action, the cause of these effects. That Mahashakti is perfect
consciousness (Cidrupini) and Bliss (Anandamayi) which produces from
Itself the contracted consciousness experiencing both pleasure and
pain. This production is not at all a "whim". It is the nature
(Svabhava) of the ultimate.

Bliss is Love (Niratishayapremaspadatvam anandatvam). The production
of the Universe is according to the Shakta an act of love,
illustrated by the so-called erotic imagery of the Shastra. The Self
loves itself whether before, or in, creation. The thrill of human
love which continues the life of humanity is an infinitesimally
small fragment and faint reflection of the creative act in which
Shiva and Shakti join to produce the Bindu which is the seed of the

I quite agree that the worship of mere Force is Asurik and except in
a transient sense futile. Force, however, may be moralized by the
good purpose which it serves. The antithesis is not rightly between
Might and Right but between Might in the service of Right and Might
in the service of Wrong. To worship force merely is to worship
matter. He however who worships The Mother in Her Material forms
(Sthularupa) will know that She has others, and will worship Her in
all such forms. He will also know that She is beyond all limited
forms as that which gives being to them all. We may then say that
Force is a gross form of Shakti, but Shakti is much more than
that "here" (Iha) and the infinite Power of Consciousness "there"
(Amutra). This last, the Shakti of worship, is called by the Shastra
the Purnahambhava or the experience "All I am".

Is Shakti Force?

by Arthur Avalon (Sir John Woodroffe), [1918]
Chapter 1: Indian Religion As Bharata Dharma
Chapter 2: Shakti: The World as Power

Chapter 3: What Are the Tantras and Their Significance?

Chapter 4: Tantra Shastra and Veda

Chapter 5: The Tantras and Religion of the Shaktas

Chapter 6: Shakti and Shakta

Chapter 7: Is Shakti Force?
Chapter 8: Cinacara (Vashishtha and Buddha)

Chapter 9: The Tantra Shastras in China

Chapter 10: A Tibetan Tantra

Chapter 11: Shakti in Taoism

Chapter 12: Alleged Conflict of Shastras

Chapter 13: Sarvanandanatha

Chapter 14: Cit-Shakti (The Consciousness Aspect of the Universe)

Chapter 15: Maya-Shakti (The Psycho-Physical Aspect of the Universe)

Chapter 16: Matter and Consciousness

Chapter 17: Shakti and Maya

Chapter 18: Shakta Advaitavada

Chapter 19: Creation as Explained in the Non-dualist Tantras

Chapter 20: The Indian Magna Mater

Chapter 21: Hindu Ritual

Chapter 22: Vedanta and Tantra Shastra

Chapter 23: The Psychology of Hindu Religious Ritual

Chapter 24: Shakti as Mantra (Mantramayi Shakti)

Chapter 25: Varnamala (The Garland of Letters)

Chapter 26: Shakta Sadhana (The Ordinary Ritual)

Chapter 27: The Pa—catattva (The Secret Ritual)

Chapter 28: Matam Rutra (The Right and Wrong Interpretation)

Chapter 29: Kundalini Shakta (Yoga)

Chapter 30: Conclusions




If this page was accessed during a web search you may wish to browse the websites listed below where this topic titled "Is Shakti Force?" or related issues are discussed, commented, criticized or researched in detail to promote peace and progress in religious harmony and spiritual development for all humanity: