
Part of fax sent to the Sahaja
Yoga centre in San Diego, USA, on April 17, 1994. [view
enlarged document]
Note "grave" in inverted commas. (You have to pardon "cosmic date", an
error out of sheer excitement.)
'Hole In The Rock' Grave
When Kash first narrated his witness of Shri Jesus’ body rising out of a
rock-like tomb on April 1, 1994, and on subsequent cross-examinations,
there was some difficulty in understanding his 'hole in the rock' grave.
Being so used to Sikh cremation rituals, graves meant corpses buried six
feet underground. Thus to picture Kash's version of a hole cut into a rock for burying
bodies was a little uncomfortable, to say the least. The family had never
heard of such a thing as a 'hole in the rock' grave.
“The
stories in the Gospels describing Jesus’ ascension
into Heaven differ from each other so
fundamentally that an unbiased reader will
recognize them for what they are: an attempt by
early Christians to add a happy ending to the
tragic story of Jesus’ death. . . . The
resurrection, if factual, would be an event unique
in the history of the world. If Jesus had risen
from the grave and, before the eyes of his
followers, ascended to Heaven, would not those who
witnessed it remember in meticulous detail every
word spoken and everything that transpired? But
check the record.
Matthew’s Gospel spends more time claiming that
the chief priests bribed the graveyard guards to
say that Jesus’ followers had stolen the body than
it does describing all of Jesus’ post-resurrection
appearance, referring only indirectly to the
ascension."
|
Charles Templeton, Farewell to God
|
In the fax to San
Diego, USA on April 17, 1994 this strange fact was thus written: "A light
then shone on the earth over the "grave" and Lord Jesus rose up in a
meditating position." The word "grave" is in inverted commas to emphasize
uncertainty; that it is not a normally accepted description of a grave!
(No mention was made of it being inside a rock mound.) Kash’s father had
to emphasize the uncertainty of "grave" as he had no idea what type of
burial place his son was talking about. All he knew was that graves were below the ground,
and definitely not above it.
But Kash insisted that it was a 'hole in the rock' grave that he witnessed
with the Great Holy Spirit and all the Divine Beings. Even when reminded
that graves are underground he did not change his story, stressing that it
was what he witnessed with Shri Mataji.
This original fax is
yet another piece of irrefutable documentary evidence as to the
authenticity of his spiritual journeys with the Great Adi Shakti in the
Sahasrara. Nearly fifty Malaysian Sahaja Yogis (see photo below)
were also given bound copies of Kash’s experiences — which included this
fax to San Diego, USA — in December 1994, when Kash’s father went there to
attend his brother's marriage. Those who still have these copies may
verify the above statement. We consider the confirmation of this evidence
by independent third-party observers critical to the authenticity and
infallibility of Kash’s witnessing the Resurrection of Lord Jesus Christ.
It also verifies that Shri Mataji Nirmala
Devi is indeed whom She claims to be.

Malaysian collective
at 1994 Christmas Puja, most of whom received bound copies of Kash's
experiences.
Subsequently, after
more than two years, he was found to be absolutely right. The Holy Spirit
Shri Mataji Nirmala Devi did take him to witness the Resurrection of Lord
Jesus Christ as it took place two thousand years ago!
On May 28, 1996, at
5.55 a.m. this precise mystical description by Kash of Jesus’ tomb were
confirmed for the first time. On page 197 of Dan Costian’s Bible
Enlightened the following facts, as witnessed by the Gospels just
after the crucifixion, were obtained by his father:
"On the day before
Passover at about the sixth hour (at noon) Pilate handed Jesus over to
them to be crucified (John 19:14,16). He was taken to Golgotha (Gulgultha,
in Aramaic), the place of the skull (Matthew 27:33; Mark 15:22; Luke
23:33; John 19:17) where He was put on the cross (Matthew 27:35; John
19:18) at the third hour (Mark 15:25). From the sixth to the ninth hour
(between 12 and 3 o’clock [p.m.]) the whole land was covered with darkness
(Matthew 27:45; Mark 15:33; Luke 23:44). At the ninth hour (3 o’clock
p.m.) Jesus died (Matthew 27:46-50; Mark 15:34-37; Luke 23:46).
In the evening (Matthew
27:57) of the preparation, that is the day before the Sabbath (Mark 15:42;
Luke 23:50; John 19:38) Joseph of Arimathaea, having obtained Pilate’s
consent, took the body down from the cross, wrapped it in linen and laid
it in a tomb hewn in the rock and rolled a great stone across the entrance
(Matthew 27:57-60; Mark 15:43-46; Luke 23:50-53; John 19:38-42)."
Dan Costian,
Bible
Enlightened
(Dan Costian, Bible Enlightened, 1995,
p. 197.)
Other sources point to the same fact of Jesus' grave:
"In Jesus’ day, the dead of wealthy families were typically laid to rest
in family burial places in use for generations, either caves or tombs cut
into soft rock. Although criminals were usually interred in the trench
graves where the poor were laid to rest, Jesus did not receive a
criminal’s burial. Since his own family would not have owned a burial spot
near Jerusalem, a follower names Joseph of Arimathea arranged to bury
Jesus in his own unused tomb in a garden near Golgotha. Such tombs usually
had one or more irregular chambers with ledges where the bodies were
placed and were accessible only by a short, low-ceilinged, ramp like
shaft. No coffin was used. As suggested in the Gospels, a rough boulder or
a specially cut closing stone blocked the entrance, basically to protect
the corpse from jackals."
The Story of Jesus
(The Story of Jesus, The Reader’s Digest Association, Inc., 1993,
p. 298.)
"Biblical scholars try to pinpoint the Resurrection
From Jerusalem Bureau
Chief Walter Rodgers
“The
earliest preaching insisted that Jesus was actually alive after being
actually dead. No feature of the Christian message caused more
intellectual problems, or more rejection in the Greek world, and some
recent trends in Western thought have found it equally hard to
accommodate. But in the Christian movement as a whole, belief in the
resurrection of Christ has obstinately remained a fixed point. It is
fundamental to the conviction of the triumph of God and of good in the
face of the crucifixion of Jesus [15:177-242]. There has followed from
it the conviction of the eventual resurrection of the rest of the
race."
|
John R. Hinnells
A Handbook of Living Religions
|
JERUSALEM (CNN) — This
weekend, hundreds of millions of Christians will be commemorating the
crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth and celebrating his resurrection.
The Resurrection in the
Holy Land some 2,000 years ago is a central tenet of Christian faith,
symbolizing life and hope and triumph over death.
Biblical scholars have
identified at least two possible sites of Golgotha, the tomb from which
Christians believe Jesus rose from the dead. One is within the walls of
modern Jerusalem in the Church of the Holy Sepulcher. The other is a
cave-like structure outside the ancient city of Jerusalem.
"We don't have striking
evidence (either site) is the place. We have circumstantial evidence for
both places," said Israeli archeologist Rame Arav.
Most Christians believe
the tomb inside Jerusalem's Church of the Holy Sepulcher is Golgotha,
according to one biblical scholar.
"Christians who come to
the Holy Sepulcher have a 99 percent certitude that Golgotha is where it's
said to be. You can actually see the rock beneath the glass," said the
Rev. Jerry Murphy O'Connor, a Dominican scholar.
Christians believe the
rock is the one that was placed in front of the tomb of Jesus. But Jewish
burials were required to be a certain distance from the Second Temple and
the Holy Sepulcher tomb is too close, according to some scholars.
A cave outside the
ancient city, near a first century Jewish tomb, is another possible
resurrection site.
"We believe the Romans
may have used this as a crucifixion site," said O'Connor.
Mary Magdalene was the
first to see the risen Christ, according to the Bible, but, "Why a woman?"
"I believe in the Jesus
movement women were extremely important. They were probably more numerous
than men and I think they had a deeper intuitive, sympathetic
understanding of what he was trying to achieve than men," said O'Connor."
CNN, April 6, 1996
"The Resurrection Of Christ
(PDF format)
...one of the cardinal facts and doctrines of the gospel. If
Christ be not risen, our faith is vain (1 Cor. 15:14). The whole
of the New Testament revelation rests on this as an historical
fact. On the day of Pentecost Peter argued the necessity of
Christ's resurrection from the prediction in Ps. 16 (Acts
2:24-28). In his own discourses, also, our Lord clearly intimates
his resurrection (Matt. 20:19; Mark 9:9; 14:28; Luke 18:33; John
2:19-22).
The evangelists give circumstantial
accounts of the facts connected with that event, and the apostles,
also, in their public teaching largely insist upon it. Ten
different appearances of our risen Lord are recorded in the New
Testament. They may be arranged as follows:
(1.) To Mary Magdalene at the sepulchre
alone. This is recorded at length only by John (20:11-18), and
alluded to by Mark (16:9-11).
(2.) To certain women, "the other Mary,"
Salome, Joanna, and others, as they returned from the sepulchre.
Matthew (28:1-10) alone gives an account of this. (Compare Mark
16:1-8, and Luke 24:1-11.)
(3.) To Simon Peter alone on the day of
the resurrection. (See Luke 24:34; 1 Cor. 15:5.)
(4.) To the two disciples on the way to
Emmaus on the day of the resurrection, recorded fully only by Luke
(24:13-35. Compare Mark 16:12, 13).
(5.) To the ten disciples (Thomas being
absent) and others "with them," at Jerusalem on the evening of the
resurrection day. One of the evangelists gives an account of this
appearance, John (20:19-24).
(6.) To the disciples again (Thomas being
present) at Jerusalem (Mark 16:14-18; Luke 24:33-40; John
20:26-28. See also 1 Cor. 15:5).
(7.) To the disciples when fishing at the
Sea of Galilee. Of this appearance also John (21:1-23) alone gives
an account.
(8.) To the eleven, and above 500
brethren at once, at an appointed place in Galilee (1 Cor. 15:6;
compare Matt. 28:16-20).
(9.) To James, but under what
circumstances we are not informed (1 Cor. 15:7).
(10.) To the apostles immediately before
the ascension. They accompanied him from Jerusalem to Mount
Olivet, and there they saw him ascend "till a cloud received him
out of their sight" (Mark 16:19; Luke 24:50-52; Acts 1:4-10).
It is worthy of note that it is
distinctly related that on most of these occasions our Lord
afforded his disciples the amplest opportunity of testing the fact
of his resurrection. He conversed with them face to face. They
touched him (Matt. 28:9; Luke 24:39; John 20:27), and he ate bread
with them (Luke 24:42, 43; John 21:12, 13).
(11.) In addition to the above, mention
might be made of Christ's manifestation of himself to Paul at
damascus, who speaks of it as an appearance of the risen Savior
(Acts 9:3-9, 17; 1 Cor. 15:8; 9:1).
It is implied in the words of Luke (Acts
1:3) that there may have been other appearances of which we have
no record.
The resurrection is spoken of as the act
(1) of God the Father (Ps. 16:10; Acts 2:24; 3:15; Rom. 8:11; Eph.
1:20; Col. 2:12; Heb. 13:20); (2) of Christ himself (John 2:19;
10:18); and (3) of the Holy Spirit (1 Peter 3:18).
The resurrection is a public testimony of
Christ's release from his undertaking as surety, and an evidence
of the Father's acceptance of his work of redemption. It is a
victory over death and the grave for all his followers.
“And
now an absurd problem came up: ‘How could God have
permitted that? For this question the deranged reason of
the little community found a downright terrifying absurd
answer: God gave his Son for forgiveness of sins, as a
sacrifice. All at once it was all over with the Gospel!
The guilt sacrifice, and that in its most repulsive,
barbaric form, the sacrifice of the innocent man for the
sins of the guilty! What atrocious paganism! — For Jesus
had done away with the concept ‘guilt’ itself — he had
denied any chasm between God and man, he lived this
unity of God and man as his ‘glad tidings’ . . . And not
as a special prerogative!"
|
Friedrich Nietzsche,
Twilight of the Idols/The Anti-Christ
|
The importance of Christ's resurrection
will be seen when we consider that if he rose the gospel is true,
and if he rose not it is false. His resurrection from the dead
makes it manifest that his sacrifice was accepted. Our
justification was secured by his obedience to the death, and
therefore he was raised from the dead (Rom. 4:25). His
resurrection is a proof that he made a full atonement for our
sins, that his sacrifice was accepted as a satisfaction to divine
justice, and his blood a ransom for sinners. It is also a pledge
and an earnest of the resurrection of all believers (Rom. 8:11; 1
Cor. 6:14; 15:47-49; Phil. 3:21; 1 John 3:2). As he lives, they
shall live also.
It proved him to be the Son of God,
inasmuch as it authenticated all his claims (John 2:19; 10:17).
"If Christ did not rise, the whole scheme of redemption is a
failure, and all the predictions and anticipations of its glorious
results for time and for eternity, for men and for angels of every
rank and order, are proved to be chimeras. 'But now is Christ
risen from the dead, and become the first-fruits of them that
slept.' Therefore the Bible is true from Genesis to Revelation.
The kingdom of darkness has been overthrown, Satan has fallen as
lightning from heaven, and the triumph of truth over error, of
good over evil, of happiness over misery is for ever secured."
Hodge.
With reference to the report which the
Roman soldiers were bribed
(Matt. 28:12-14) to circulate concerning Christ's resurrection,
"his disciples came by night and stole him away while we slept,"
Matthew Henry in his "Commentary," under John 20:1-10, fittingly
remarks, "The grave-clothes in which Christ had been buried were
found in very good order, which serves for an evidence that his
body was not 'stolen away while men slept.' Robbers of tombs have
been known to take away 'the clothes' and leave the body; but none
ever took away 'the body' and left the clothes, especially when
they were 'fine linen' and new (Mark 15:46). Any one would rather
choose to carry a dead body in its clothes than naked. Or if they
that were supposed to have stolen it would have left the
grave-clothes behind, yet it cannot be supposed they would find
leisure to 'fold up the linen.' "
www.christiananswers.net
Note:
The Gospel of Mary from the Nag Hammadi Library reveals the deeper
mystical experiences and superior spiritual understanding of Mary
Magdalene which are more consistent with Christ’s teachings.
When Peter questions
Mary Magdalene about her gnostic experience with Shri Jesus, she replies:
"I, I saw the Lord in a vision and I said to him, ‘Lord I saw you today in
a vision.’" He answered and said to me, "Blessed are you that you did not
waver at the sight of me. For where the mind is, there is the treasure." I
said to him, "Lord, how does he who sees the vision see it through the
soul or through the spirit?’ The Saviour answered, "He does not see
through the soul nor through the spirit, but the mind which [is] between
the two — that is [what] see the vision and it is [. . .. . .. . .. . ..]"
(the mid- section of the original text is missing from here.)
|

|
|
Shri
Mataji Nirmala Devi
|
|
|
“What Christ did there are many people — I read the other day one book —
saying that He never resurrected Himself. I must say they scientifically,
they proved scientifically. Can you imagine? How can you prove
scientifically I don’t understand. According to them He was, He didn’t
die. Of course He cannot die! He is an Eternal Being. I know that. That
part is correct — that He never died. He died the way a Divine has to die,
but He resurrected Himself as a Divine has to resurrect. He definitely
resurrected Himself, but these scientists were not there to see. Then
He descended again; that’s a different point altogether. But He definitely
resurrected His Divine body. But He had such a beautiful, confident
personality after that, that, wherever He went He left a great imprint on
them.
But this is the trouble
that they try to prove everything scientifically. You cannot prove
Christ’s Resurrection scientifically. That’s why you cannot deny it
either.
What He did at the
grosser level at that time has to happen within you. That He has
done. That’s why they say you have to pass through Him. He has done that
for you. He has really done it. And we have to see that happening
within us. Not by saying that: "Now we follow Christ." And you have
one big flag: "Followers of Christ." You see, we are all Christian
soldiers walking, and we believe in Christ, and we are all resurrected.’
NO! YOU ARE NOT. You are not. At the most, if you are a good Christian or
a good Hindu, good Muslim — good, again I say — then you are well
balanced for your Resurrection.
But if you are not even
that, then it’s a problem for Me and a problem for you . . . the way
people have carried this simple method, of organizing people into better
lives, into something so absurd — like hating each other, killing each
other or all sorts of things you know. It has nothing to do with God.
Believe Me. And "we are the chosen ones", and "we are the best", and "we
are the selected" — this is self-certificate. If I say I am the graduate
of Cambridge University how long can I befool myself and others, which I
am not. In the same way we have to be really, really get our certificates
from our Selves that we are evolved; not from anybody else.
So we boil down to this
point that we have to be really, really honest with ourselves because it
is our loss; nobody else, that so far we have not achieved that state of
Spirit, and that in all humility we are going to achieve it. We have to
achieve it, and that we have to accept that this should happen.
It’s a very simple
thing. There is no complication if you have not complicated yourself much.
But even if you have the Divine Power knows how to disentangle you, and
work it out. This is the Blessing of the Divine where you become the
Spirit and then you reach your Absolute, from where there is no doubt. If
you want to know what happened you just start feeling a Cool Breeze into
your hands, from your hands. And then you ask a question, "Is there God?"
and the Breeze is much more. If you ask about a thug, "Is he a good man?",
and then it stops.
This rapport is
established with your Spirit. It speaks to you as a Cool Breeze. This
Cool Breeze in the hand is the energy of your Spirit flowing by which your
diseases get cured, and you can cure the diseases of others. You can raise
the Kundalinis of others, and give the Realization. And you can enjoy the
beauty of Nature, not thinking about it or grossly vaulting it, but just
enjoying in a full way. This is the short and sweet.
But it is such a long story
started thousands of years back, and today it is just reaching its Climax. The
Fruit is just going to be formed. It’s just the Blossom Time has come for this
story, and if the seekers co-operate I am sure it will work out. Have all the
hopes. May God bless you.”
Shri Vimala Devi
All Is Beautifully Made,
Hampstead, U.K. — April 22, 1982
(Vimala [347th]:
Pure, clear, untouched by Mala or impurity.)
|

|
|
Shri
Mataji Nirmala Devi
|
|
|
“Krishna
has said about the Eternal Life and the Spirit. It cannot be
killed by anyone. It cannot be killed. It is eternal. You
cannot cut it. It cannot be blown out by any wind. And He
(Jesus) had to prove it. And to prove it they had to have
somebody here on this Earth with that Energy to come in with a
body, to act like a human being, live like a human being, and
go through the Drama of Death to show that He overcomes death.
The Resurrection is . . . a Message, that in Resurrection He
had to die, and He had to be resurrected because He said that
it is beyond death. Krishna had said that the Spirit is beyond
death. The Spirit had to come on this Earth.
So you understand when
we talk of Christ how little we know as to how this was done. It is the
most difficult thing that He did.”
Shri Vandya Devi
The New Age Has Started, Houston, USA — October 6, 1981
|

|
|
Shri
Mataji Nirmala Devi
|
|
|
“Now
we have seen in His life that He was absolutely spotlessly
immaculate. He had no defects in Him. He was a perfect
personality. Then why did He want to resurrect one can ask?
What is in His time is the Resurrection?
His Resurrection is
like making the way through the Agnya Chakra for all of you to pass
through it. He was like the Gate, or we should say He was the One who
opened the Gate for all of you. Because He was so perfect He had no
problems as we have of our Chakras, our Kundalini. He had no problems.
But He was the
complete compassion of, in the nature of vibrations. Vibrations became
complete compassion. So much so that even when He was resurrected and even
before that when He was crucified He said that, "Oh God the Father, please
forgive these people because they do not know what they are doing." Such
forgiveness, such compassion, and the Mother had to watch all that,
keeping quiet because that was the game, that was the thing one has to do.
He had to play His game and He played it so well.
So when we talk about
Christ we have to remember one thing that He has done all this for us. Now
what are we going to do for Him? He is the pattern we have to follow.
Supposing if that is the pattern we have to follow then it’s not that we
carry the cross on our shoulder — that’s not the pattern you have to
follow.
Many people think
because He carried the cross, we carry the cross. Anybody can carry the
cross. If you in India give about five rupees to a loader he can carry a
cross across. What is so great about it? What’s so great in carrying a
cross on your shoulder? Any wrestler can do it. Anybody can do it. That’s
not the point. The point is we have to carry the work of Christ, of
Resurrection. That is what we have to realize.
We have to understand
the importance of our being, of our lives, like Christ understood that He
has come for this great Job here. And though He came as a human being —
though He came as an ordinary son of an ordinary carpenter, though on this
Earth He had a body and He lived like other human beings — still He knew
what He had to do. He knew what He had to achieve and He achieved it. I
think His was the most difficult task which He achieved and which He
finished it so well that today we are having all the benefits of that.”
Shri Komalangi Devi
|

|
|
Shri
Mataji Nirmala Devi
|
|
|
“At the time of Shri Krishna He dared speak about spirituality only to one
person and that one was Arjuna. But we are much better off these days.
Then, of course, of course after Shri Krishna who took the
lead was Christ; and He started talking about spirituality.
Even you’ll be surprised that Abraham or Moses did not talk of
spirituality. They talked about God but not of spirituality.
Till Christ came nobody said that you have to be born again
even in the, on the other side of the world!”
Shri Srsti-Kartri Devi
Shri Krishna’s Advent, Ipswich, U.K. — August 19, 1990
|

|
|
Shri
Mataji Nirmala Devi
|
|
|
“Now
we have to openly say and tell these fundamentalists, "You
don’t know about the Truth, or the Power that is working. You
are stupid people running after something that is a mirage and
all of you will end up in hell." You may tell people that the
new Announcement has to come to say that running after
falsehood is not going to take you to God. We believe in the
Power of Love and not in the power of hatred. We believe that
everyone is capable of finding the Truth and getting to the
Heaven of that Paradise which is promised to us — the Kingdom
of God.”
Shri Samhrtasesa-Pasanda Devi
The Announcement, Sahasrara Puja, Fuiggi, Italy — May 6, 1990
(Samhrtasesa-Pasanda
[355th]: Destroyer of all non-believers.)
|
|
![]() |
|
JESUS' RESURRECTION CONTENTS:
|
|
Witnessing
The Resurrection Of Jesus
|
|
'Hole In The Rock'
Grave
|
|
Good
Friday Greetings
|
|
|
|
HER DIVINE MESSAGE TO HUMANITY
|
|
Video Excerpts of Shri Mataji
|
|
Self-Realization/Second Birth/Allah's Baptism
|
|
Shakti/Last Judgment/Al-Qiyamah Forum
|
|
L'expérience de la Réalisation du Soi
|
|
Shri Adi Shakti Forum
|
|
Worldwide Contacts
|
|
|
|
MAIN HEADINGS
|
|
Home Page
|
|
Declaration And Divine Message
|
|
Introduction
|
|
New Age Children
|
|
Miracle Photo
|
|
Meeting His Messengers
|
|
Prophecies
|
|
Age of Aquarius
|
|
Our Conscious Earth
|
|
Adi Shakti's Descend
|
|
Witnessing Her Miracles
|
|
Jesus' Resurrection
|
|
His Human Adversary
|
|
Book of Revelation
|
|
Book Of
Enlightenment
|
|
Al-Qiyamah
|
|
His Light
Within
|
|
His
Universe Within
|
|
His Beings
Within
|
|
Subtle
System
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
Lectures To Earth
|
|
Shri Mataji
|
|
FAQ
|
|
Self-Realization
|
|
Drumbeat Of Death
|
|
Dance Of
Divinity
|
|
Site Map
|
|
Table Of
Contents
|
|
Shri Adi
Shakti Forum
|
|
Contact Us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contents: |
|
Witnessing
The Resurrection Of Jesus
|
|
The
'Hole In The Rock Grave'
|
|
Good
Friday Greetings
|
|
|
|
External
Links: |
|
Resurrection
|
|
Resurrection:
Fact Or Fiction
|
|
The
Resurrection Of Christ
|
|
Evidence
For The Resurrection
|
|
Links
To Resurrection Articles
|
|
From
Jesus To Christ
|
|
|
|
Proof
Of Divinity:
|
|
Proof
Of Divinity 1
(click photos
to enlarge)
|
|
Proof
Of Divinity 2
(click photos
to enlarge)
|
|
|
|
External
Links In French:
|
|
Qui
Est Shri Mataji?
(0.05
MB)
|
|
Qui
Est Shri Mataji?
(3.56
MB)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“Given
all these testimonies, Christ's Resurrection cannot be
interpreted as something outside the physical order,
and it is impossible not to acknowledge it as an
historical fact. It is clear from the facts that the
disciples' faith was drastically put to test by their
master's Passion and death on the cross, which he had
foretold. [503] The shock provoked by Passion was so
great that at least some of the disciples did not at
once believe in the news of the Resurrection. Far from
showing us a community seized by a mystical
exaltation, the Gospels present us with disciples
demoralized and frightened. For they had not believed
the holy women returning from the tomb and had
regarded their words as an "idle tale"
[504]. When Jesus reveals himself to the Eleven on
Easter evening, "he upbraided them for their
unbelief and hardness of heart, because they had not
believed those who saw him after he had risen.”
[505](503. Cf. Lk 22:31-32; 504. Lk 24:11, cf. Mk
16:11, 13; 505. Mk 16:14.)
|
J.
Cardinal Ratzinger, Catechism of the Catholic
Church
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“"Christ
stands at the heart of this gathering of men into the
"family of God." . . . But above all in the
great Paschal mystery — his death on the cross and
his resurrection — he would accomplish the coming of
his kingdom. "And I, when I am lifted up from the
earth, will draw all men to myself." Into this
union with Christ all men are called.”
[250]
(250. Jn 12:32; cf. LG 3.)
|
J.
Cardinal Ratzinger, Catechism of the Catholic
Church
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“God
"desires all men to be saved and to come to the
knowledge of the truth" [29]: that is, of Christ
Jesus. [30] Christ must be proclaimed to all nations
and individuals, so that this revelation may reach the
ends of the earth:
God graciously arranged that the things he had once
revealed for the salvation of all the peoples should
remain in their entirety, throughout the ages, and be
transmitted to all generations.”
[31]
(29. 1Tim 2:4; 30. Cf. Jn 14:6; 31. DV 7; cf. 2 Cor
1:20, 3:16-4:6.
|
J.
Cardinal Ratzinger, Catechism of the Catholic
Church
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“"When
we move on to the biblical narrative of Jesus’
resurrection, we discover another series of problems
present in the contradictions found in the Gospel
texts. Almost every detail of the resurrection of
Jesus appearing in one Gospel is contradicted in
another Gospel. Yet Christianity was born in whatever
the experience of the Easter moment was, and if no
ultimate reality resides in that experience, then, in
Paul’s words, our "faith is in vain" (Cor.
15:14). Such a faith is also probably destined not to
be eternal.
But what was the experience that has come to be called
the resurrection? Did its reality differ from the
description of it given in the Gospel narratives? Can
we get beyond those biblical words to a place where we
can touch the uninterpreted essence of Easter? Is the
truth of Easter bound in time, or is it beyond time
and therefore beyond history? Since the experience of
resurrection is absolutely essential to the rise of
Christianity, this creedal phrase becomes the great
divide for the modern man or woman who yearns to be a
believer. Where each of us stands in relation to this
issue will determine more than most any other whether
or not we can still be defined as Christians.
The text of this creed moves on, driving us next into
what the church has traditionally called "the
second coming" and "the final
judgment." What meaning can the phrase "He
will come again to judge the living and the dead"
have as the third millennium of the common era takes
center stage? The New Testament clearly expected the
almost momentary return of Jesus to this earth (John
14:3; Matt 16:27; Mark 9:1). Yet that return has not
occurred. Was that Gospel anticipation another example
of inaccuracies in the biblical account?
Beyond that problem, however, we need to ask what the
judgment of God means in the light of the way life is
now understood. What is the basis on which what the
Bible calls the final judgment will be conducted? When
the Bible was written, the people knew little or
nothing about social and psychological
interdependence. Can anyone be judged today simply as
an individual who is solely responsible for who he or
she is or for what he or she has done? Postmodern
people who know the depths of human interconncetedness,
who understand psychological wounding and blessing,
cannot be moralistic in the way these traditional
creedal images of judgment have always assumed. . . .
When we examine the history of the Church, it appears
that guilt, not forgiveness, has been the great lever
of ecclesiastical control. Guilt has also been the
source of so much of the Church’s power. The Church’s
faith in life after death has been predicated on that
guilt being alleviated, purged, or punished eternally.
How do the realities fit into this great creedal
crescendo? . . .
Many of us can continue to be believers only if we are
able to be honest believers. We want to be people of
faith, not people drugged on the narcotic of religion.
We are not able to endure the mental lobotomy that one
suspects is the faith of those who project themselves
as the unquestioning religious citizens of our age. We
do not want to be among those who fear that if we
think about what we say about God, either our minds
will close down or our faith will explode. We are not
drawn to those increasingly defensive religious
answers of our generation. Nor are we willing to
pretend that those ancient words still have the power
and meaning for us if they do not. We wonder if it is
still possible to be a believer and a citizen of our
century at the same time.”
|
John
Shelby Spong, Why Christianity Must Change Or Die
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“"In
the wake of the Second World War, Mohandas K. Gandhi
— called Mahatma ("great-souled") by the
Hindu people he was to lead to independence — was
asked what Jesus meant to him. His answer was
published in the popular weekly magazine Liberty.
Although a great part of my life has been devoted to
the study of religion and to discussion with religious
leaders of all faiths, I know that I cannot avoid
seeming presumptuous in writing about the figure of
Jesus and trying to explain what significance and
meaning he has had for me. I do so solely because I
have been told more than once by certain Christian
friends that, since I am not a Christian and do not
(to quote the exact words) "accept him in my
innermost heart as the only-begotten Son of God,"
I can never realize the full meaning of his teachings,
and therefore can never draw upon the greatest source
of spiritual strength known to man. . . .
The adjective "begotten" has a meaning for
me that I like to think is deeper and possibly
grandeur than its literal one. To my mind it implies
spiritual birth. My interpretation, in other words, is
that in his own life Jesus stood nearest to God. And
it is in this sense that I look upon him as the Son of
God . . .
It is impossible, I think, to weigh the merits of the
world’s several religions, and unnecessary and
pointless even to attempt to do so. But in each one, I
believe, there was an original common impulse — the
desire to help and to improve the life of all men. I
attribute the miracles of Jesus not in a literal
sense, which seems to me unimportant, but as the
dramatic and unforgettable expression of this impulse,
as the most vivid lesson possible to impart — not to
pass by the sick and suffering, not to judge those
who, in the world’s eyes, have sinned, but to
forgive them and thus help them to enter a new and
better life.
These lessons stand for us today as they stood for the
men and women of Jesus’ own time.
Jesus gave mankind, in these lessons and in his life,
the great goal toward which to aspire. It is because
there is such a goal, and because there was such a
figure as that of Jesus, that I cannot be pessimistic,
but instead as hopeful and confident of the future.
And it is because his life has this significance and
meaning for me that I do not regard him as belonging
to Christianity alone, but rather to the whole world,
to all its peoples, no matter under what name they
worship.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
“The
central theme of the preaching of Shri Jesus is the
Kingdom of God (Matt. 4:17, 23; Mark 1:15; Luke 4:43).
There are some fifty sayings and parables of Shri
Jesus proclaiming this kingdom. There are two main
elements of this concept — it is eschatological and
refers to the end of time when God will be firmly
established in the universe to vindicate the
righteous; it extols His followers to prepare
themselves for its coming (Luke 10:25-28), which
requires repentance (Matt. 4:17; Mark 1:15), and a
complete change of heart required to receive this
future good news or gospel.”
|
J.R.
Porter, The Illustrated Guide to the Bible
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |