Idol Worship in Jainism:
A Study of Scriptural Origins, Sectarian Divergence, and Symbolic Function

Swami Dayananda (founder of Arya Samaj) "blamed" the Jains for having started idol worship [4]. He may actually be right, the Lohanipur idols are likely older than any Vishnu, Shiva or Buddha idols. The Vedika Brahmins actually had a disdain for temple worship as one can observe from Manu-Smriti etc.

1. Introduction

Jainism, an ancient Indian religion, is renowned for its profound emphasis on non-violence (ahimsa), asceticism, and a systematic path to liberation. A central feature of Jain practice for the majority of its followers is the worship of idols (murtis) of the Tirthankaras, the enlightened beings who have achieved liberation and shown the path. However, this seemingly ubiquitous practice is not without its historical and theological contestations. A fundamental question arises: if idol worship is so central, why do the Jain Agamas, the oldest and most authoritative scriptures, contain no explicit references to temples or the worship of idols? This paper will explore this critical question by analyzing the observations and arguments presented in a scholarly email by Y. Malaiya. It will argue that the absence of idol worship in the Agamas led to significant sectarian movements that rejected image worship, while the mainstream tradition developed a sophisticated theology in which the idol serves not as a deity, but as a powerful symbol for meditation and a source of communal identity. This duality—between scriptural silence and popular practice—defines the rich and complex history of idol worship in Jainism.

2. The Scriptural Foundation and the Rise of Aniconic Sects

The observation that "The Jain Agamas seems to give not one reference to poojas or even to temples with moortis etc." is credited to Lonka Shah, a 15th-century Śvetāmbara scholar. His insistence on a literal interpretation of the scriptures, which he believed contained no sanction for idol worship, led him to found the Lonka Gachchh, a movement dedicated to aniconic practice. This reformist impulse had a lasting impact, giving rise to two major Śvetāmbara sects that continue to reject idol worship to this day: the Sthanakvasis and the Terapanthis. Both are direct descendants of Lonka Shah's movement and emphasize a form of worship centered on meditation, scripture, and preaching, rather than on rituals involving physical images.

This challenge to idol worship was not confined to the Śvetāmbara tradition. Among the Digambaras, a parallel movement emerged around the same time: the Taranpanth, founded by Taran Taran Swami. Followers of this sect, also known as the Samaiyapanth, venerate the sacred books (granth) rather than idols, representing a Digambara current of aniconism. The very existence of these sects underscores the validity of the initial observation: the scriptural basis for idol worship is not explicit, leading a significant minority of Jains to conclude that it is an unnecessary or even incorrect addition to the faith.

3. Historical Antecedents and the Question of Origin

The debate over idol worship in Jainism is further complicated by archaeological evidence. Y. Malaiya notes that the Lohanipur idols are "likely older than any Vishnu, Shiva or Buddha idols." This suggests that while the practice of idol worship may not be detailed in the earliest scriptures, the craft of creating Jain-like icons is exceptionally ancient. This historical fact has fueled speculation about the origins of image worship in India. Swami Dayananda Saraswati, the founder of the Arya Samaj, famously "blamed" the Jains for having started idol worship.

Whether or not one accepts this attribution of origin, it points to a significant cultural and religious dynamic. Malaiya contrasts this with the attitude of "Vedika Brahmins," who, as evidenced by texts like the Manu-Smriti, held a disdain for temple-based image worship. This suggests that the emergence of idol worship as a mainstream practice was not a linear development from Vedic religion, but a more complex phenomenon in which Jain (and Buddhist) communities may have played a pioneering role. The subsequent widespread adoption of image worship by various Hindu traditions represents a later, though profound, integration of this practice.

4. The Theological Rationale: Idol as Symbol, Not Deity

For the majority of Jains who do practice murti-puja, the critique from aniconic sects is based on a misunderstanding of the act itself. The email clarifies a crucial theological distinction: "in Jainism it is not the idol that is worshipped, rather the idol is a symbol for the deity." The physical object, a piece of rock or metal, is not considered inherently divine or capable of independent action. Its significance is entirely derived from the installation ceremony (pratishtha), during which the image is ritually consecrated. This ceremony symbolically re-enacts the key life events of a Tirthankara, thereby transforming the inert object into a sacred presence that represents the enlightened being.

The devotee does not pray to the stone, but uses the consecrated image as a focal point to meditate on the qualities of the Tirthankara—their omniscience, equanimity, and detachment. The idol serves as a tangible reminder of the spiritual ideal, an anchor for the mind during contemplation. As Malaiya states, "Symbols like the temples anchor our faith and provide a sense of identity." They are tools for spiritual practice and communal cohesion, not objects of worship in the sense of bestowing favors or intervening in worldly affairs. Ultimately, a Jain layperson (sravaka) is defined by the observance of ethical vows (vratas), not by the specific symbols they use for meditation.

5. Conclusion: Diversity Within Unity

The question of idol worship in Jainism reveals a tradition characterized by profound internal diversity and a long history of theological debate. While the Jain Agamas do not explicitly mention murti-puja, this silence has led to divergent paths: one that rejects images in favor of a purely internal and scriptural devotion (as seen in the Sthanakvasi, Terapanthi, and Taranpanth sects), and another that has developed a rich and elaborate culture of icon worship. The latter, however, is undergirded by a sophisticated theology that clearly distinguishes the veneration of a symbol from the worship of a deity.

The historical evidence of ancient Jain idols further complicates the narrative, suggesting that Jain communities were among the earliest practitioners of image worship in India, a practice that was initially looked down upon by some Brahmanical authorities. This historical context, combined with the theological rationale of the idol as a meditative tool, demonstrates that mainstream Jain murti-puja is not a blind adherence to ritual, but a considered and symbolic practice. The coexistence of both idol-worshipping and non-idol-worshipping sects within the same religious fold ultimately highlights a central tenet of Jainism: that the path to liberation is personal, and that while methods may differ—whether through the veneration of a symbolic image or through the study of scripture—the ultimate goal of conquering one's own passions and achieving spiritual purity remains the same.

Idol worship: Jain Agamas give no reference to moorthis in poojas or temples

“To: jain-list@gw.ddb.com
Subject: temples with moortis
From: "Y. Malaiya"
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 1998 10:09:05
Sender: malaiya@CS.ColoState.EDU

Temples with moortis

Rolf Heiner Koch wrote:

The Jain Agamas seems to give not one reference to poojas or even to temples with moortis etc...[1]

This was the observation of Lonka Shah who had founded the Lonka Gachchh opposed to idol worship. The Swetambar Sthanakvasi and the Swetambar Terapanthi sects[2], both descendants of the Lonka Gachchh, do not believe in idol worship. Around the same time Taranpanth was started among the Digambaras [3], who worship the books but not the idols.

There has been considerable discussion about this, with the murtipujak scholars pointing to passages that seem to suggest idol worship.

Swami Dayananda (founder of Arya Samaj)"blamed"The Jains for having started idol worship [4]. He may actually be right, the Lohanipur idols are likely older than any Vishnu, Shiva or Buddha idols. The Vedika Brahmins actually had a disdain for temple worship as one can observe from Manu-Smriti etc.

It should be noted that in Jainism it is not the idol that is worshipped, rather the idol is a symbol for the deity. The worshiper simply uses the idol to meditate about the Tirthankara himself. An idol is just a piece of rock until it is has gone through the installation ceremony, where it undergoes the same events as the Tirthankaras had. One thus imagines the presence of the Tirthankara through the idol as a symbol.

Ultimately, the Sravakas are characterized by the vratas, and not by symbols used for meditation.

Symbols like the temples anchor our faith and provide a sense of identity.

Incidentally it should be noted that there have always been Brahmins who were part of the Jain Sangh, just like there were kings, farmers, merchants, artisans etc who were Jain. This is also true for Buddhism. Today, one often connects Brahmins exclusively with worship of Krishna, Shiva etc, but it was not always the case.”

Y. Malaiya"

Related articles: