The teaching of the Paraclete: fulfillment of the promise of eschatological divine instruction.
This page passionately delves into Stephen Witmer’s profound insights on divine instruction in early Christianity, where revelation transcended mere doctrine to become a transformative force! The Holy Spirit ignited hearts and reshaped souls through lived experience. Shri Mataji Nirmala Devi, as the Adi Shakti—the promised Comforter—fulfills this sacred vision, ushering in Self-realization through Kundalini awakening. From 1970 to 2011, Her four-decade mission completed Jesus’ message, not with words alone but through the vibrant, living transmission of the Spirit! Early Christian teachings longed for a living teacher, not a static text, and this truth radiates here: divine instruction is not bound by scripture—it is the Holy Spirit, fully manifested, speaking to humanity. The Spirit now teaches from within, heralding the dawn of the age of fulfillment!

"The teaching of the Holy Spirit/Paraclete
I have argued that divine instruction comes through Jesus. However, it is likely that to be "taught by God" in John 6.45 also has an internal aspect. In addition to Jesus' teaching, divine instruction seems to be an inward teaching by which an individual is drawn to Jesus. This is indicated by the parallel between the "drawing" of 6.44, and the teaching and learning of 6.45ab. That teaching in the Fourth Gospel can be understood as an internal event is clear from the reference to the Holy Spirit/Paraclete teaching all things (14.26).
John 14.26 is in fact a significant passage for discerning how the evangelist understands divine instruction. Here, the Paraclete and Holy Spirit are clearly identified. The future tense of the verbs in 14.26 is notable; the Spirit's activity is said to be (from Jesus' perspective) in the future. As Schnackenburg suggest, 14.26 is directly connected with 14.25. Jesus speaks to the disciples while abiding with them (14.25), but cannot clarify everything in his limited discourse. Therefore, he promises them the future teaching of the Holy Spirit/Paraclete (14.26). In light of the many clear parallels between the Paraclete and Jesus in the Fourth Gospel, this suggests that the Holy Spirit continues the didactic role of Jesus. If my argument in this chapter is correct (i.e., that Jesus' teaching is understood by the evangelist as direct divine instruction) then the teaching of the Paraclete, as the continuation of Jesus' teaching, must also be understood as the fulfillment of the promise of eschatological divine instruction...
The didactic storyline of the Fourth Gospel suggests that in order to portray the didactic relationship between Jesus and the Father, the evangelist develops an analogy based on the relationship of a father and son. The ultimate purpose of the analogy is to indicate that Jesus learns so perfectly from the Father that he becomes transparent to God. Therefore, when people hear Jesus' teaching, they receive direct divine instruction. I conclude the chapter by suggesting that the teaching of the Holy Spirit/Paraclete, because it is understood as the continuation of Jesus' teaching, is also regarded as the fulfillment of the promise of eschatological divine instruction.”
Stephen E. Witmer, Divine instruction in Early Christianity
Coronet Books (December 2008), pp. 106-7
The Teaching of the Paraclete as the Fulfillment of Eschatological Divine Instruction
Introduction
The promise of the Paraclete, or Comforter, as recorded in the Gospel of John, stands as one of the most significant and debated prophecies in Christian eschatology. Jesus assured his disciples that he would not leave them as orphans, but would send "another Paraclete" who would abide with them forever. For nearly two millennia, mainstream Christian doctrine has held that this promise was fulfilled at Pentecost, with the descent of the Holy Spirit upon the apostles. However, a deeper analysis of the Johannine texts, coupled with an understanding of eschatological divine instruction, suggests a different fulfillment—one that points not to a collective event, but to the arrival of a specific, individual divine personality in the end times. This paper will argue that the teaching of the Paraclete, as the continuation of Jesus' teaching, must be understood as the fulfillment of the promise of eschatological divine instruction, and will present evidence that this promise has been unequivocally fulfilled in the person and teachings of Shri Mataji Nirmala Devi.
The Biblical Foundation: The Paraclete in the Gospel of John
The term Paraclete (from the Greek paraklētos) appears five times in the New Testament, exclusively in the writings of John (four times in the Gospel and once in his first epistle). The word itself carries a rich legal and supportive connotation, often translated as "Counselor," "Advocate," "Helper," or "Comforter." Jesus introduces the Paraclete in his Farewell Discourse (John 14-16), a series of teachings given to his disciples on the night of the Last Supper. A close examination of these passages reveals the specific functions and characteristics of the promised Comforter.
Jesus first promises to send "another Paraclete," implying that the disciples already had one in his own person[1]. This new Paraclete is identified as the "Spirit of truth" whom the world cannot receive because it neither sees nor knows him (John 14:16-17). This distinction between the world's inability to perceive the Paraclete and the disciples' ability to know him is critical. The promise is not for a vague, ethereal presence, but for a tangible guide who would be known by the true seekers of truth.
The primary role of the Paraclete is didactic. Jesus states, "But the Counselor, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in my name, will teach you all things and will remind you of everything I have said to you" (John 14:26). This teaching is not a new revelation, but a continuation and clarification of Jesus' own message. The Paraclete's function is to guide the disciples "into all truth" (John 16:13), to declare what is to come, and to glorify Jesus by taking what is his and making it known[2]. This act of reminding, teaching, and guiding implies a personal, intelligent presence, not merely an abstract force.