Lao Tzu: the Tao of Reality.
Lao Tzu: the Tao of Reality.
A history of pantheism by Paul Harrison.
There is a thing, formless yet complete. Before heaven and earth it
existed. We do not know its name, but we call it Tao. It is the
Mystery of Mysteries.
The Tao te Ching is the oldest scripture of Taoism. It was composed
during the warring states period when China descended into a chaos of
rival kingdoms, some time between the sixth and the fourth or third
centuries BC. It was supposedly written by Lao Tan, a possibly
mythical figure, said to have lived till he was 160 or 200 years old.
The classical Chinese historian Ssuma Chien says the work was by Li
Erh, a custodian of imperial archives from the state of Ch'u in
southern China, in the present province of Honan. This was a fertile,
well-watered state.”Its people make little exertion, delight in
life, and neglect to store anything.”
Li Erh was no seeker after fame.”The chief aim of his studies was
how to keep himself concealed and remain unknown.”says Ssuma Chien.
Li Erh wrote his ideas only because, as he was heading into
retirement, the royal gatekeeper pleaded with him to record his ideas
before he disappeared into oblivion. He may have written the book
under the pseudonym Lao Tan to avoid attention.
A brutally honest personal confession in the Tao te Ching [chapter
20] suggests that he was not always happy with his reclusive way of
life and personality:
I alone am inert, showing no sign of desires,
like an infant that has not yet smiled.
Wearied, indeed, I seem to be without a home.
The multitude all possess more than enough,
I alone seem to have lost all ...
Common folks are indeed brilliant;
I alone seem to be in the dark.
The book of Chuang Tzu pays tribute to his character: "Men all seek
the first. He alone sought the last. He said: "Accept the world's
refuse.”Men all seek happiness. He alone sought completion in
adaptation ... He was always generous and tolerant towards things.”
[Chuang Tzu, chapter 33]
The Tao te Ching is a short, dense book of only 5,250 words -
probably the most influential 5,250 words ever written. Its ideas
became very popular under the Han dynasty in the second century BC.
Lao Tan/Li Erh was even said to have met Confucius. After one visit
Confucius' disciples asked him how he was able to correct and
admonish Lao Tzu.”In him I have seen the dragon that rides on the
cloudy air," replied Confucius.”My mouth fell open and I was unable
to shut it; how could I admonish and correct Lao Tan?”After another
crushing visit he admitted: "In the knowledge of the Tao am I any
better than a tiny creature in vinegar?“A final episode shows him
becoming virtually a disciple of Lao Tzu.
These accounts are, of course, Taoist propaganda. In reality
Confucius would have regarded Lao Tzu as a dangerous threat to
established custom and filial piety. The Tao te Ching contains not a
single word about either of these central Confucian concepts. Indeed
by stressing spontaneity and harmony with nature, it represents a
rebellion against Confucian obsession with form and duty.
But Taoism did alter the course of Confucianism, leading to the
synthesis of neo-Confucianism in thinkers like Chang Tsai. It also
moulded the shape of East Asian Buddhism, giving Buddhism a much less
negative stance to the world.
Was Lao Tan/Li Erh a pantheist? His description of the reality of the
Tao is of a mysterious, numinous unity underlying and sustaining all
things. It is inaccessible to normal thought, language or perception.
While he never calls the Tao a God, and rejects the idea that it is
personal or concerned with humans, he clearly views it in the same
light of awe and respect as believers view their Gods. Since the Tao
is omnipresent and sustains everything, the Tao te Ching is clearly
espousing a materialist form of pantheism.
The Tao te Ching does not fall into the trap of Buddhism, assuming
that because there is an underlying unity the diversity of the world
is an illusion and there is only"emptiness.”It recognizes both
being and non-being as complementary. Non-being defines being as dark
outlines light. Being and diversity emanate from non-being.
Lao Tan/Li Erh also believed that human happiness consisted in
understanding and living and acting in harmony with this underlying
Reality. This means following a simple, frugal and peaceful way of
life, not seeking after wealth, power or fame. Unlike the Chuang Tzu
he is not an advocate of total withdrawal from public action. But he
stresses the need for taking minimal action. He prefers non-violence
over violence, softness over hardness, water over sharpened swords.
He is a clear pre-cursor of both Jesus and Gandhi.
In government his philosophy makes him in certain ways Machiavellian
and laissez-faire. Kings should not encourage learning, wisdom or
virtue. They should fill their people's bellies and keep their minds
empty. A happy country would be one where people could hear dogs
barking in the next village, yet would have no desire to go there.
There are also repeated suggestions through the text that the sage
can achieve long life and escape death. This gave rise to a much less
philosophical aspect of later Taoism: the pursuit of everlasting
life, not in heaven but on this earth, but through physical
immortality, and by often magical means.
There are dozens of translations of the Tao te Ching, many of them
radically different from one another. Unless otherwise indicated, the
texts below are from Wing-Tsit Chan in A Sourcebook in Chinese
Philosophy, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1969. Additional
biographical material from Fung-Yu Lan, A History of Chinese
Philosophy, trs Derk Bodde, Princeton University Press, New Jersey,
1952, and James Legge, The Texts of Taoism, Sacred Books of the East
vol 40, Dover, New York, 1962.
Lao Tzu: the Tao of Reality.
A history of pantheism by Paul Harrison.
Disclaimer: Our material may be copied, printed and distributed by referring to this site. This site also contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the education and research provisions of "fair use" in an effort to advance freedom of inquiry for a better understanding of religious, spiritual and inter-faith issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission from the copyright owner.